CoDAS
http://www.codas.periodikos.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240065pt
CoDAS
Original Article

Programa de estimulação das habilidades auditivas: uma proposta escolar

Hearing abilities stimulation program for schools

Ana Flávia de Oliveira Nalom Baruchi; Eliane Schochat

Downloads: 0
Views: 24

Resumo

RESUMO: Objetivo: Elaborar e verificar a efetividade de um programa de estimulação das HA inserido na grade curricular comum e aplicado por professores em sala de aula.

Método: Um programa de estimulação das habilidades auditivas (HA) foi elaborado e aplicado no ano letivo de escolares da educação infantil. Trinta e quatro crianças foram estimuladas auditivamente (GEA) e comparadas a um grupo placebo (GP. N=31). Os alunos foram avaliados quanto às HA, habilidades pré-leitoras e de decodificação, pré e pós-intervenção. Duas reavaliações foram realizadas após a aplicação do programa, permitindo um acompanhamento do desempenho dos escolares em meio à pandemia Covid-19.

Resultados: O programa proposto conta com atividades que foram aplicadas pelos professores durante 25 semanas, entre 10-15 minutos/dia, em ambiente escolar. As HA estimuladas foram: detecção, discriminação, habilidades temporais, figura-fundo, fechamento, memória e atenção. Houve diferença significativa entre o desempenho do GEA e GP após a aplicação do programa.

Conclusão: O programa pôde ser incorporado na grade curricular, auxiliando no desenvolvimento das habilidades preconizados pelo Ministério da Educação. Após a estimulação auditiva, percebeu-se melhor desempenho em figura-fundo auditiva, resolução temporal, identificação e produção de rima e produção de palavra a partir de fonema dado no GEA.

Palavras-chave

Audição, Percepção Auditiva, Estimulação Auditiva, Leitura, Aprendizagem

Abstract

Purpose  To develop and verify the effectiveness of a hearing abilities (HA) stimulation program included in the regular school curriculum and applied by teachers in the classroom.

Methods  An HA stimulation program was developed and applied to preschoolers during the school year; 34 children underwent auditory stimulation (ASG) and were compared to a placebo group (PG; n = 31). The students were assessed regarding their HA and pre-reading and decoding skills before and after the intervention. They were reassessed twice after applying the program to monitor the students' performance amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results  The program includes activities applied at school by teachers for 25 weeks, lasting 10-15 minutes/day, stimulating the following HA: detection, discrimination, temporal processing, figure-ground, closure, memory, and attention. The ASG and PG performances differed significantly after the program.

Conclusion  The program was incorporated into the curriculum, helping to develop the skills recommended by the Ministry of Education. After auditory stimulation, ASG performed better in auditory figure-ground, temporal resolution, rhyme identification and production, and word production from the phoneme given.

Keywords

Hearing; Auditory Perception; Acoustic Stimulation; Reading; Learning

References

1 Moore JK, Guan YL. Cytoarchitectural and axonal maturation in human auditory córtex. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2001;2(4):297-311. http://doi.org/10.1007/s101620010052. PMid:11833605.

2 Jain C, Priya MB, Joshi K. Relationship between temporal processing and phonological awareness in children with speech sound disorders. Clin Linguist Phon. 2020;34(6):566-75. http://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2019.1671902. PMid:31566027.

3 Vanvooren S, Poelmans H, Voz AD, Ghesquère P, Wouters J. Do prereaders’ auditory processing and speech perception predict later literacy? Res Dev Disabil. 2017;70:138-51. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.09.005. PMid:28938227.

4 Murphy CFB, Schochat E. Correlações entre leitura, consciência fonológica e processamento temporal auditivo. Pró-Fono R Atual Cient. 2009;21(1):13-8. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-56872009000100003.

5 Fostick L, Revah H. Dyslexia as a multi-deficit disorder: working memory and auditory temporal processing. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018;183:19-28. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.010. PMid:29304447.

6 Terto SSM, Lemos SMA. Aspectos temporais auditivos em adolescentes do 6º ano do ensino fundamental. Rev CEFAC. 2013;15(2):271-86. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462012005000040.

7 Musiek FE, Schochat E. Auditory training and central auditory processing disorders: a case study. Semin Hear. 1998;19(4):357-66. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1082983.

8 Brasil. Base Nacional Curricular Comum. Brasília: Ministério da Educação; 2017.

9 Pereira LD, Schochat E. Testes auditivos comportamentais para avaliação do processamento auditivo central. São Paulo: Editora Pró Fono; 2011.

10 Auditec of Saint Louis. Masking Level Difference: evaluation manual. St. Louis: Auditec, Inc.; 2003.

11 Keith RW. RGDT – Random Gap Detection Test. St. Louis: Auditec, Inc.; 2000.

12 Capellini SA, César ABPC, Germano GD. Protocolo de Identificação Precoce dos Problemas de Leitura – IPPL. Ribeirão Preto: Book Toy; 2017.

13 Hassaan MR, Ibraheem AO. Auditory training program for Arabic-speaking children with auditory figure-ground déficits. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;83:160-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.02.003. PMid:26968071.

14 Masquelier MP. Management of auditory processing disorders. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 2003;57(4):301-10. PMid:14714947.

15 Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2007.

16 Moore DR. Auditory development and the role of experience. Br Med Bull. 2002;63(1):171-81. http://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/63.1.171. PMid:12324392.

17 Musiek FM, Gollegly KM, Baran JA. Myelination of the corpus callosum and auditory processing problems in children: theoretical and clinical correlates. Semin Hear. 1984;5(03):231-40. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1095748.

18 Baran JA, Musiek FE. Avaliação comportamental do sistema nervoso auditivo central. In: Musiek FE, Rintelmann WF. Perspectivas atuais em avaliação auditiva. Barueri: Manole; 2001. p. 371-409.

19 Musiek F, Shinn J, Hare C. Plasticity, auditory training, and auditory processing disorders. Semin Hear. 2002;23(4):263-75. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35862.

20 Sharma M, Purdy SC, Kelly AS. A randomized control trial of interventions in school-aged children with auditory processing disorders. Int J Audiol. 2012;51(7):506-18. http://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2012.670272. PMid:22512470.

21 Moore DR. Editorial: auditory processing disorder. Ear Hear. 2018;39(4):617-20. http://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000582. PMid:29664753.

22 Filippini R, Brito NFS, Neves-Lobo IF, Schochat E. Maintenance of auditory abilities after auditory training. Audiol Commun Res. 2014;19(2):112-6. http://doi.org/10.1590/S2317-64312014000200003.

23 Cibian AP, Pereira LD. Questionnaire for use in the monitoring of auditory training results. Distúrb Comun. 2015;27(3):466-78.

24 Chermak GD, Musiek FE. Auditory training: principles and approaches for remediating and managing auditory processing disorders. Semin Hear. 2002;23(4):297-308. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35878.

25 Murphy CB, Peres AK, Zachi EC, Ventura DF, Pagan-Neves LO, Wertzner HF, et al. Generalization of sensory auditory learning to top-down skills in a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015;26(1):19-29. http://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.26.1.3. PMid:25597457.

26 Dias AMN. Desempenho de escolares para o teste de detecção de intervalo de silêncio em tom puro. [monografia]. São Paulo (SP): Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo; 2004.

27 Wightman F, Allen P, Dolan T, Kistler D, Jamieson D. Temporal resolution in subjects. Child Dev. 1989;60(3):611-24. http://doi.org/10.2307/1130727. PMid:2737011.

28 American Academy of Audiology. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and management of children and adults with central auditory processing disorder. Reston: American Academy of Audiology; 2010.

29 Van Deun L, van Wieringen A, Van den Bogaert T, Scherf F, Offeciers FE, Van de Heyning PH, et al. Sound localization, sound lateralization, and binaural masking level differences in young children with normal hearing. Ear Hear. 2009;30(2):178-90. http://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e318194256b. PMid:19194296.

30 Rakhlin NV, Mourgues C, Cardoso-Martins C, Kornev AN, Grigorenko EL. Orthographic processing is a key predictor of reading fluency in good and poor readers in a transparent orthography. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2019;56:250-61. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.12.002. PMid:31798206.

31 Viterbo G, Katzir T, Goldfarb L. Accelerating reading via local priming. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020;205:103056. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103056. PMid:32203735.

32 Carroll JM, Snowling MJ, Hulme C, Stevenson J. The development of phonological awareness in preschool children. Dev Psychol. 2003;39(5):913-23. http://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.5.913. PMid:12952403.
 


Submitted date:
03/14/2024

Accepted date:
08/25/2024

680cf2bea9539514a17d7da3 codas Articles

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections