Identificação perceptivo-auditiva de contrastes de obstruintes por crianças com e sem Transtorno Fonológico
Identification of obstruent contrasts by children with and without phonological disorders
Mayara Ferreira de Assis; Elissa Barbi Mouro Pagliari Cremasco; Isabella Rodrigues Domingues; Larissa Cristina Berti
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose (1) To compare auditory-perceptual accuracy and reaction time in children with and without phonological disorders for identifying the contrast of obstruents, and (2) to verify whether there is an effect of the phonetic class (stops vs. fricatives) on the accuracy, reaction time and error pattern.
Methods Sixty-two children (41 diagnosed with phonological disorders and 21 with typical phonological development), aged between 4 and 9 years, participated in the study. An identification task was performed in the obstruent class using the speech perception assessment instrument (PERCEFAL). Reaction time, percentage of correct and incorrect answers, and the error pattern were considered in the analysis. Results: Regarding auditory–perceptual accuracy, children with phonological disorders had a significantly lower average of correct answers than children with typical phonological development for both obstruent classes. Regarding reaction time, children with phonological disorders showed longer reaction times for the stop class (p≤0.05). In the error pattern analysis, errors involving the articulatory point were the most frequent for both classes and both groups of children.
Conclusion The presence of phonological disorders implies attenuated perceptual accuracy. The longer reaction time of children with phonological disorders depends on the phonic class.
Keywords
Referências
1 APA: American Psychiatric Association. Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais: DSM-5. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2014.
2 Bird J, Bishop D. Perception and awareness of phonemes in phonologically impaired children. Eur J Disord Commun. 1992;27(4):289-311.
3 Broen PA, Strange W, Doyle SS, Heller JH. Perception and production of approximant consonants by normal and articulation-delayed preschool children. J Speech Hear Res. 1983;26(4):601-8.
4 Rvachew S, Jamieson DG. Perception of voiceless fricatives by children with a functional articulation disorder. J Speech Hear Disord. 1989;54(2):193-208.
5 Marchetti PT, Dalcin LM, Balen SA, Mezzomo CL. Processamento auditivo temporal e os traços distintivos de crianças com transtorno fonológico. Rev CEFAC. 2022;24(3):e2022.
6 Barrozo TF. Relação entre medidas fonológicas, de produção de fala e os potenciais evocados auditivos [tese]. São Paulo: Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo; 2018.
7 Hearnshaw S, Baker E, Munro N. The speech perception skills of children with and without speech sound disorder. J Commun Disord. 2018;71:61-71.
8 Assis MF, Cremasco EBMP, Silva LM, Berti LC. Desempenho perceptivo-auditivo em crianças com e sem transtorno fonológico na classe das oclusivas. CoDAS. 2021;33(2):e20190248.
9 Cremasco EBMP, Assis MF, Berti LC. Identificação de contrastes fricativos do Português Brasileiro em crianças com e sem distúrbio dos sons da fala. Revista Linguagem & Ensino. 2021;24(4):686-700.
10 Hearnshaw S, Baker E, Munro N. Speech perception skills of children with speech sound disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019;62(10):3771-89.
11 Berti LC. PERCEFAL: instrumento de avaliação da identificação de contrastes fonológicos. Audiol Commun Res. 2017;22:e1727.
12 Gifalli G, Berti LC, Marini VCC, Pegoraro-Krook MI, Dutka JCR. Assessment of speech perception in individuals with cleft lip and palate: percefal case report. In: Anais do Simpósio Internacional de Fissuras Orofaciais e Anomalias Relacionadas: a fronteira do conhecimento na reabilitação das anomalias craniofaciais; 2019; Bauru. Bauru: Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, Universidade de São Paulo; 2019. p. 45.
13 Roque LMR, Berti LC. O efeito da idade em uma tarefa de identificação das vogais tônicas do Português Brasileiro. Audiol Commun Res. 2015;20(4):349-54.
14 Seekpng [Internet]. Related Wallpaper - monstrinhos coloridos. Skeeping; 2018 [citado 2018 Abr 11]. Disponível em:
15 Patterson RD, Johnsrude IS. Functional imaging of the auditory processing applied to speech sounds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363(1493):1023-35.
16 Berti LC, Assis MF, Barbi EMPC. Speech production and speech perception in children with speech sound disorder. Clin Linguist Phon. 2022;36(2-3):183-202.
17 Berti LC, Guilherme J, Esperandino C, Oliveira AM. Relationship between speech production and perception in children with Speech Sound Disorders. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics. 2020;19(1):13.
18 Cabbage KL, Hogan TP, Carrell TD. Speech perception differences in children with dyslexia and persistent speech delay. Speech Commun. 2022;82(1):14-25.
19 Pisoni DB, Tash J. Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories. Percept Psychophys. 1974;15(2):285-90.
20 Berti LC. Desempenho perceptivo-auditivo de crianças na identificação de contrastes fônicos. Alfa Revista de Linguística. 2017;61(1):81-103.
21 Wang MD, Bilger RC. Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features. J Acoust Soc Am. 1973;54(5):1248-66.
22 Kent RD, Read C. Análise acústica da fala. São Paulo: Cortez Editora; 2015.
23 Miller GA, Nicely PE. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am. 1955;27(2):338-52.
24 Edwards J, Gibbon F, Fourakis M. On discrete changes in the acquisition of the alveolar/velar stop consonant contrast. Lang Speech. 1997;40(2):203-10.
25 Barbosa PA, Madureira S. Manual de fonética acústica experimental: aplicações a dados do português. São Paulo: Cortez Editora; 2023.
26 Munson B, Baylis AL, Krause MO, Yim D. Representation and access in phonological impairment. Lab Phonol. 2010;10:381-404.
27 Munson B, Edwards J, Beckman ME. Phonological knowledge in typical and atypical speech-sound development. Top Lang Disord. 2005;25(3):190-206.
Submetido em:
29/03/2024
Aceito em:
20/08/2024