CoDAS
http://www.codas.periodikos.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240273
CoDAS
Artigo Original

Infodemiologia e audição: análise do comportamento de buscas da população brasileira

Infodemiology and hearing: analysis of the search behavior of the Brazilian population

Ademir Antonio Comerlatto Junior; Mariane Perin da Silva Comerlatto; Iris Layane Santos Santana; Jamille Conceição Santos; Andreza Messias de Arruda; Glória Maria Silva Lima; Kelly da Silva

Downloads: 0
Views: 23

Resumo

Objetivo: Investigar o comportamento de busca online por informações relacionadas à perda auditiva, zumbido e tontura pela população brasileira. Método: Estudo ecológico e infodemiológico analisou o comportamento de busca online no Brasil para os termos “Perda Auditiva”, “Tontura” e “Zumbido” entre janeiro de 2014 e maio de 2024, utilizando dados do Google Trends™. Foram calculados os volumes de pesquisa relativo normalizado (VPR) e analisadas as correlações entre os termos usando o teste de Spearman, a tendência com o teste de Mann-Kendall, e quebras estruturais com nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: Encontradas correlações significativas entre os termos “Tontura” e “Perda Auditiva”, “Zumbido” e “Perda Auditiva” e “Zumbido” e “Tontura”. Observou-se tendência de crescimento no VPR para “Perda Auditiva”, “Tontura” e “Zumbido”. As quebras estruturais detectadas para cada termo de busca ocorreram nos seguintes períodos: Perda auditiva (duas quebras): fevereiro de 2016 e janeiro de 2021; Tontura (cinco quebras): julho de 2015 e de 2017; fevereiro de 2019; abril de 2020 e dezembro de 2021 e Zumbido (cinco quebras): abril de 2015 e de 2017, março de 2018, abril de 2020 e de 2022. Conclusão: O comportamento de busca na última década revela um crescente interesse por informações sobre perda auditiva, zumbido e tontura, com resultados correlacionados entre os três termos. Sergipe apresentou o maior volume de buscas por “perda auditiva”, Maranhão por “tontura” e São Paulo por “zumbido”.

Palavras-chave

Infodemiologia; Perda Auditiva; Zumbido; Tontura; Vertigem

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the online search behavior of the Brazilian population for information related to hearing loss, tinnitus, and dizziness. Methods: This ecological and infodemiological study analyzed online search behavior in Brazil for the terms “Hearing Loss,” “Dizziness,” and “Tinnitus” from January 2014 to May 2024, using data from Google Trends™. Normalized relative search volumes (VPR) were calculated, and correlations between the terms were analyzed using Spearman’s test, trend analysis with the Mann-Kendall test, and structural breaks with a significance level of 5%. Results: Significant correlations were found between the terms “Dizziness” and “Hearing Loss,” “Tinnitus” and “Hearing Loss,” and “Tinnitus” and “Dizziness.” An increasing trend in VPR was observed for “Hearing Loss,” “Dizziness,” and “Tinnitus.” Structural breaks for each search term occurred in the following periods: Hearing Loss (two breaks): February 2016 and January 2021; Dizziness (five breaks): July 2015, July 2017, February 2019, April 2020, and December 2021; and Tinnitus (five breaks): April 2015, April 2017, March 2018, April 2020, and April 2022. Conclusion: The search behavior over the past decade reveals a growing interest in information about hearing loss, tinnitus, and dizziness, with correlated results among the three terms. Sergipe had the highest search volume for “hearing loss,” Maranhão for “dizziness,” and São Paulo for “tinnitus.”

Keywords

Infodemiology; Hearing Loss; Tinnitus; Dizziness; Vertigo

Referências

  • 1Moretti FA, Oliveira VE, Silva EMK. Acesso a informações de saúde na internet: uma questão de saúde pública? Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2012;58(6):650-8. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0104-4230(12)70267-1 PMid:23250092.
    » http://doi.org/10.1016/S0104-4230(12)70267-1
  • 2Eysenbach G. Infodemiology and infoveillance: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the Internet. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(1):e11. http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1157 PMid:19329408.
    » http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1157
  • 3Zhou X, Ye J, Feng Y. Tuberculosis surveillance by analyzing Google trends. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011;58(8):2247-54. http://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2011.2132132 PMid:21435969.
    » http://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2011.2132132
  • 4Kang M, Zhong H, He J, Rutherford S, Yang F. Using Google Trends for influenza surveillance in South China. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55205. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055205 PMid:23372837.
    » http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055205
  • 5Nuti SV, Wayda B, Ranasinghe I, Wang S, Dreyer RP, Chen SI, et al. The use of Google Trends in health care research: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e109583. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583 PMid:25337815.
    » http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583
  • 6Alicino C, Bragazzi NL, Faccio V, Amicizia D, Panatto D, Gasparini R, et al. Assessing Ebola-related web search behaviour: insights and implications from an analytical study of Google Trends-based query volumes. Infect Dis Poverty. 2015;4(1):54. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-015-0090-9 PMid:26654247.
    » http://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-015-0090-9
  • 7Mavragani A, Ochoa G. Infoveillance of infectious diseases in USA: STDs, tuberculosis, and hepatitis. J Big Data. 2018;5(1):30. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-018-0140-9
    » http://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-018-0140-9
  • 8Vos T, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd-Allah F, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211-59. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2 PMid:28919117.
    » http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2
  • 9Huber M, Reuter L, Weitgasser L, Pletzer B, Rösch S, Illg A. Hearing loss, depression, and cognition in younger and older adult CI candidates. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1272210. http://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1272210 PMid:37900591.
    » http://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1272210
  • 10Huang AR, Lin FR. Hearing loss and dementia in older adults: a narrative review. J Chin Med Assoc. 2024;87(3):252-8. http://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001042 PMid:38112446.
    » http://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001042
  • 11WHO: World Health Organization. World report on hearing [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2021 [citado em 2023 Ago 1]. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/world-report-on-hearing
    » https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/world-report-on-hearing
  • 12IBGE: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde (PNS): dados de pessoas com deficiência auditiva, ano 2019 [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2021 [citado em 2023 Ago 1]. Disponível em: https://www.pns.icict.fiocruz.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/liv101846.pdf
    » https://www.pns.icict.fiocruz.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/liv101846.pdf
  • 13Jarach CM, Lugo A, Scala M, van den Brandt PA, Cederroth CR, Odone A, et al. Global prevalence and incidence of tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79(9):888-900. http://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2189 PMid:35939312.
    » http://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2189
  • 14Google Trends™ [Internet]. 2023 [citado em 2023 Ago 1]. Disponível em: https://trends.google.com/trends/
    » https://trends.google.com/trends/
  • 15Dancey C, Reidy J. Estatística sem matemática para psicologia: usando SPSS para Windows. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2006.
  • 16Tang M, Wang J, Zhang Q. Prevalence of hearing loss in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2023;143(5):416-22. http://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2023.2204909 PMid:37148313.
    » http://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2023.2204909
  • 17Shibafar S, Jafarlou F. A review on the impacts of COVID-19 on the auditory system: implications for public health promotion research. Health Promot Perspect. 2023;13(4):280-9. http://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2023.33
    » http://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2023.33
  • 18Jafari Z, Kolb BE, Mohajerani MH. Perda auditiva, zumbido e tontura na COVID-19: uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise. J Can Sci Neurol. 2021;12:1-12.
  • 19Chirakkal P, Al Hail AN, Zada N, Vijayakumar DS. COVID-19 and tinnitus. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;100(2, Suppl):160S-2S. http://doi.org/10.1177/0145561320974849 PMid:33275033.
    » http://doi.org/10.1177/0145561320974849
  • 20De Luca P, Scarpa A, Ralli M, Tassone D, Simone M, De Campora L, et al. Auditory disturbances and SARS-CoV-2 infection: brain inflammation or cochlear affection? Systematic review and discussion of potential pathogenesis. Front Neurol. 2021;12:707207. http://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.707207 PMid:34421805.
    » http://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.707207
  • 21Li H, Xia J, Bennett D, Roque F, Bam RA, Tavares ABT, et al. Long-COVID-19 clinical and health outcomes: an umbrella review. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2023;10:20499361231198335. http://doi.org/10.1177/20499361231198335 PMid:37720384.
    » http://doi.org/10.1177/20499361231198335
  • 22Viola P, Ralli M, Pisani D, Malanga D, Sculco D, Messina L, et al. Tinnitus and equilibrium disorders in COVID-19 patients: preliminary results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278(10):3725-30. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06440-7 PMid:33095432.
    » http://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06440-7

Submetido em:
28/08/2024

Aceito em:
16/01/2025

69011e7ba953955ea82fb4e6 codas Articles

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections