Speech speed in audiovisual resources in the learning process of university students: a scoping review
Kelly da Silva; Pablo Jordão Alcantra Cruz; Nayara Farias Costa Santos; Flávia Vanessa Menezes de Jesus; Mara Behlau; Anna Alice Almeida; Raphaela Barroso Guedes-Granzotti
Abstract
Keywords
Referências
1 Cardall S, Krupat E, Ulrich M. Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: are students voting with their feet. Acad Med. 2008;83(12):1174-8.
2 Gulley OD, Jackson AL. (). A case study on using instructor-recorded videos in an upper level economics course. Int Rev Econ Educ. 2016;23:28-33.
3 Alharbi HA, Shehadeh F, Awaji NY. Immediate knowledge retention among nursing students in live lecture and video-recorded lecture: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022;60:103307.
4 Merhavy ZI, Bassett L, Melchiorre M, Hall MPM. The impact of lecture playback speeds on concentration and memory. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):515.
5 Lovell K, Plantegenest G. Student utilization of digital versions of classroom lectures. Med Sci Educ. 2009;19(1):20-5.
6 Lang D, Chen G, Mirzaei K, Paepcke A. Is faster better? A study of video playback speed. In: 10th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge; 2020 Mar 23-27; Frankfurt. Proceedings. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2020. p. 260–269.
7 Lent R. Cem bilhões de neurônios: conceitos fundamentais de neurociências. 2. ed. São Paulo: Editora Atheneu; 2010.
8 Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-73.
9 Barker TH, Habibi N, Aromataris E, Stone JC, Leonardi-Bee J, Sears K, et al. The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias quasi-experimental studies. JBI Evid Synth. 2024;22(3):378-88.
10 Oliveira JMD, Pereira RPL, Massignan C, Stefani CM, Canto GL. Análise da Qualidade Metodológica de Estudos de Prevalência com a Ferramenta do Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). In: Canto GDL, Stefani CM, Massignan C, editors. Risco de viés em revisões sistemáticas: guia prático. Florianópolis: Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Baseadas em Evidências – COBE UFSC; 2021, Chapter 12.
11 Nagahama T, Morita Y. Effect analysis of playback speed for lecture video including instructor images. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology. 2017;11:50-8.
12 Jacobson BP, Dorneich MC, Potter LA. Impact of lecture video acceleration in a flipped introductory engineering course. Int J Eng Educ. 2018;34(6):1863-75.
13 Song K, Chakraborty A, Dawson M, Dugan A, Adkins B, Doty C. Does the podcast video playback speed affect comprehension for novel curriculum delivery? A randomized trial. West J Emerg Med. 2018;19(1):101-5.
14 Fountoukidou S, Matzat U, Ham J, Midden C. Effects of a virtual model’s pitch and speech rate on affective and cognitive learning. persuasive technology. In: 14th International Conference of Persuasive Technology: Development of Persuasive and Behavior Change Support Systems; 2019 Apr 9-11, Limassol. Proceedings. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 16-27.
15 Murphy DH, Hoover KM, Agadzhanyan K, Kuehn JC, Castel AD. Learning in double time: the effect of lecture video speed on immediate and delayed comprehension. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021;36(1):69-82.
16 Ness I, Opdal K, Sandnes FE. On the convenience of speeding up lecture recordings: increased playback speed reduces learning. In: 4th International Conference of Innovative Technologies and Learning; 2021 Nov 29-Dec 1. Proceedings. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 461-9.
17 Mo CY, Wang C, Dai J, Jin P. Corrigendum: Video playback speed influence on learning effect from the perspective of personalized adaptive learning: a study based on cognitive load theory. Front Psychol. 2022;13:947209.
18 Simonds BK, Meyer KR, Quinlan MM, Hunt SK. Effects of instructor speech rate on student affective learning, recall, and perceptions of nonverbal immediacy, credibility, and clarity. Commun Res Rep. 2006;23(3):187-97.
19 Liu R, Jia H. Effects of instructional video playback speed and pre‑embedded questions on learning. Asia Pac Educ Rev. 2024;26(2):383-95.
20 Kiyak YS, Budakoğlu Iİ, Masters K, Coşkun Ö. The effect of watching lecture videos at 2× speed on memory retention performance of medical students: an experimental study. Med Teach. 2023;45(8):913-7.
21 Wallace S, Schuler MS, Kaulback M, Hunt K, Baker M. Nursing student experiences of remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurs Forum. 2021;56(3):612-8.
22 Khan S, Kambris MEK, Alfalahi H. Perspectives of university students and faculty on remote education experiences during COVID-19: a qualitative study. Educ Inf Technol. 2022;27(3):4141-69.
23 Watson R. Cada um no seu ritmo: como usuários usam as velocidades de reprodução para assistir vídeos [Internet]. Youtube Official Blog; 2022 [cited 2024 Oct 16]. Available from:
24 Medina A, Socarrás G, Krishnamurti S. L2 Spanish Listening Comprehension: the role of speech rate, utterance length, and l2 oral proficiency. Mod Lang J. 2020;2(104):439-56.
25 Akiyama Y, Saito K. Development of Comprehensibility and its Linguistic Correlates: a longitudinal study of video-mediated telecollaboration. Mod Lang J. 2016;100(3):585-609.
26 Camiciottoli BC. Adjusting a business lecture for an international audience: a case study. Engl Specif Purposes. 2005;24(2):183-99.
27 Lin LF. Chinese-speaking learners’ cognitive comprehension problems with English video-based materials. J Educ Comput Res. 2014;51(1):23-47.
Submetido em:
16/10/2024
Aceito em:
21/07/2025
