CoDAS
http://www.codas.periodikos.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240326en
CoDAS
Scoping Review

Speech speed in audiovisual resources in the learning process of university students: a scoping review

Kelly da Silva; Pablo Jordão Alcantra Cruz; Nayara Farias Costa Santos; Flávia Vanessa Menezes de Jesus; Mara Behlau; Anna Alice Almeida; Raphaela Barroso Guedes-Granzotti

Downloads: 0
Views: 18

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Purpose: This study aimed to map studies that investigated the influence of speech rate on the reproduction of audiovisual resources in university students' learning using a Scope review.

Research strategies: The PCC strategy was used where P- University students, C- Increased or decreased speech rate, C- Learning. The searches were conducted using the SciELO, Lilacs, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases.

Selection criteria: Scientific articles published in the databases above with a target audience of university students were included; works that compared average speech rate with increased or decreased speed and had learning-related skills as the study response.

Data analysis: The Joanna Briggs Institute checklists were used for methodological quality assessment.

Results: We found that four articles observed an improvement in learning performance when the audiovisual resource was presented at a speed of up to 2x, three did not observe a difference and two studies observed a worsening in the skills involved in learning.The results indicate a low risk of bias in most studies included.

Conclusion: A study indicated improved learning in audiovisuals at a speed slower than 1x. It was observed that reproduction speed rates of audiovisual resources impact university students' learning process. Rates greater than 2x limit the learning process. Rates within the normal range (between 1x and 1.75x) are more favorable for capturing the content.

Keywords

Processing Speed, Learning, University Students, Speech, Comprehension

Referências

1 Cardall S, Krupat E, Ulrich M. Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: are students voting with their feet. Acad Med. 2008;83(12):1174-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31818c6902. PMid:19202495.

2 Gulley OD, Jackson AL. (). A case study on using instructor-recorded videos in an upper level economics course. Int Rev Econ Educ. 2016;23:28-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2016.06.004.

3 Alharbi HA, Shehadeh F, Awaji NY. Immediate knowledge retention among nursing students in live lecture and video-recorded lecture: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022;60:103307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103307. PMid:35144164.

4 Merhavy ZI, Bassett L, Melchiorre M, Hall MPM. The impact of lecture playback speeds on concentration and memory. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):515. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04491-y. PMid:37464312.

5 Lovell K, Plantegenest G. Student utilization of digital versions of classroom lectures. Med Sci Educ. 2009;19(1):20-5.

6 Lang D, Chen G, Mirzaei K, Paepcke A. Is faster better? A study of video playback speed. In: 10th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge; 2020 Mar 23-27; Frankfurt. Proceedings. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2020. p. 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375466.

7 Lent R. Cem bilhões de neurônios: conceitos fundamentais de neurociências. 2. ed. São Paulo: Editora Atheneu; 2010.

8 Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850. PMid:30178033.

9 Barker TH, Habibi N, Aromataris E, Stone JC, Leonardi-Bee J, Sears K, et al. The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias quasi-experimental studies. JBI Evid Synth. 2024;22(3):378-88. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00268. PMid:38287725.

10 Oliveira JMD, Pereira RPL, Massignan C, Stefani CM, Canto GL. Análise da Qualidade Metodológica de Estudos de Prevalência com a Ferramenta do Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). In: Canto GDL, Stefani CM, Massignan C, editors. Risco de viés em revisões sistemáticas: guia prático. Florianópolis: Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Baseadas em Evidências – COBE UFSC; 2021, Chapter 12.

11 Nagahama T, Morita Y. Effect analysis of playback speed for lecture video including instructor images. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology. 2017;11:50-8.

12 Jacobson BP, Dorneich MC, Potter LA. Impact of lecture video acceleration in a flipped introductory engineering course. Int J Eng Educ. 2018;34(6):1863-75.

13 Song K, Chakraborty A, Dawson M, Dugan A, Adkins B, Doty C. Does the podcast video playback speed affect comprehension for novel curriculum delivery? A randomized trial. West J Emerg Med. 2018;19(1):101-5. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2017.10.36027. PMid:29383063.

14 Fountoukidou S, Matzat U, Ham J, Midden C. Effects of a virtual model’s pitch and speech rate on affective and cognitive learning. persuasive technology. In: 14th International Conference of Persuasive Technology: Development of Persuasive and Behavior Change Support Systems; 2019 Apr 9-11, Limassol. Proceedings. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17287-9_2.

15 Murphy DH, Hoover KM, Agadzhanyan K, Kuehn JC, Castel AD. Learning in double time: the effect of lecture video speed on immediate and delayed comprehension. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021;36(1):69-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3899.

16 Ness I, Opdal K, Sandnes FE. On the convenience of speeding up lecture recordings: increased playback speed reduces learning. In: 4th International Conference of Innovative Technologies and Learning; 2021 Nov 29-Dec 1. Proceedings. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 461-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91540-7_47.

17 Mo CY, Wang C, Dai J, Jin P. Corrigendum: Video playback speed influence on learning effect from the perspective of personalized adaptive learning: a study based on cognitive load theory. Front Psychol. 2022;13:947209. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.947209. PMid:36405115.

18 Simonds BK, Meyer KR, Quinlan MM, Hunt SK. Effects of instructor speech rate on student affective learning, recall, and perceptions of nonverbal immediacy, credibility, and clarity. Commun Res Rep. 2006;23(3):187-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090600796401.

19 Liu R, Jia H. Effects of instructional video playback speed and pre‑embedded questions on learning. Asia Pac Educ Rev. 2024;26(2):383-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09964-3.

20 Kiyak YS, Budakoğlu Iİ, Masters K, Coşkun Ö. The effect of watching lecture videos at 2× speed on memory retention performance of medical students: an experimental study. Med Teach. 2023;45(8):913-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2189537. PMid:36931309.

21 Wallace S, Schuler MS, Kaulback M, Hunt K, Baker M. Nursing student experiences of remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurs Forum. 2021;56(3):612-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12568. PMid:33728660.

22 Khan S, Kambris MEK, Alfalahi H. Perspectives of university students and faculty on remote education experiences during COVID-19: a qualitative study. Educ Inf Technol. 2022;27(3):4141-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10784-w. PMid:34690525.

23 Watson R. Cada um no seu ritmo: como usuários usam as velocidades de reprodução para assistir vídeos [Internet]. Youtube Official Blog; 2022 [cited 2024 Oct 16]. Available from: https://blog.youtube/intl/pt-br/inside-youtube/youtube-tendencias-velocidadedereproducao

24 Medina A, Socarrás G, Krishnamurti S. L2 Spanish Listening Comprehension: the role of speech rate, utterance length, and l2 oral proficiency. Mod Lang J. 2020;2(104):439-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12639.

25 Akiyama Y, Saito K. Development of Comprehensibility and its Linguistic Correlates: a longitudinal study of video-mediated telecollaboration. Mod Lang J. 2016;100(3):585-609. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12338.

26 Camiciottoli BC. Adjusting a business lecture for an international audience: a case study. Engl Specif Purposes. 2005;24(2):183-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.05.002.

27 Lin LF. Chinese-speaking learners’ cognitive comprehension problems with English video-based materials. J Educ Comput Res. 2014;51(1):23-47. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.51.1.b.
 


Submetido em:
16/10/2024

Aceito em:
21/07/2025

698cda1da953956a633ab6a2 codas Articles

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections