CoDAS
http://www.codas.periodikos.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240391en
CoDAS
Artigo Original

Validation of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in Brazilian Portuguese

Rodrigo Dornelas; Vanessa Veis Ribeiro; Alice Lopes; Thassiany Carpanez; Surinder Birring; Mara Behlau

Downloads: 0
Views: 121

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to validate the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) for Brazilian Portuguese. Methods: Validation followed the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). Data collection included a sociodemographic questionnaire, the translated version of LCQ-Brazil (LCQ-Br), self-perception of laryngeal sensitivity, cough frequency and intensity, the Cough Severity Index (CSI-Br), and the Newcastle Laryngeal Hypersensitivity Questionnaire (LHQ-Br). The LCQ-Br retained its original structure with 19 items across physical, psychological, and social domains. Participants completed the LCQ-Br on three occasions to assess validity, reliability, and responsiveness. Results: Ninetyeight patients with chronic cough (79% women; mean age of 49) participated. Construct validation confirmed the LCQ-Br’s factorial structure. For concurrent validity, negative correlations were observed between LCQ-Br domains and self-perceived laryngeal sensitivity, cough frequency and intensity, and CSI-Br factors (physical, social, psychological, and total scores). A positive correlation was found between the LCQ-Br total and LHQ-Br scores. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.952), and test-retest reliability yielded a coefficient of 0.455. The responsiveness analysis demonstrated significant reductions in LCQ-Br scores post-intervention for physical, psychological, and total domains. Conclusion: The LCQ-Br is a valid, reliable, and responsive tool for assessing health status in chronic cough patients, making it suitable for clinical practice and research applications.

Keywords

Cough; Chronic Cough; Validation Study; Self-testing; Disease; Larynx

Referências

  • 1Keller JA, McGovern AE, Mazzone SB. Translating cough mechanisms into better cough suppressants. Chest. 2017;152(4):833-41. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.016 PMid:28552543.
    » http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.016
  • 2Schappert SM, Burt CW. Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: united States, 2001-02. Vital Health Stat 13. 2006;(159):1-66. PMid:16471269.
  • 3Ford AC, Forman D, Moayyedi P, Morice AH. Cough in the community: a cross sectional survey and the relationship to gastrointestinal symptoms. Thorax. 2006;61(11):975-9. http://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2006.060087 PMid:16809412.
    » http://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2006.060087
  • 4Nascimento JK. Prevalência de tosse crônica e suas principais causas: estudo de base populacional [dissertação]. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; 2017.
  • 5Meltzer EO, Zeiger RS, Dicpinigaitis P, Bernstein JA, Oppenheimer JJ, Way NA, et al. Prevalence and burden of chronic cough in the United States. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(11):4037-4044.e2. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2021.07.022 PMid:34333189.
    » http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2021.07.022
  • 6Vertigan AE, Theodoros DG, Gibson PG, Winkworth AL. Efficacy of speech pathology management for chronic cough: a randomised placebo controlled trial of treatment efficacy. Thorax. 2006;61(12):1065-9. http://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2006.064337 PMid:16844725.
    » http://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2006.064337
  • 7Murry T, Tabaee A, Owczarzak V, Aviv JE. Respiratory retraining therapy and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux in the treatment of patients with cough and paradoxical vocal fold movement disorder. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006;115(10):754-8. http://doi.org/10.1177/000348940611501007 PMid:17076097.
    » http://doi.org/10.1177/000348940611501007
  • 8Palmer AD, Bolognone RK, Thomsen S, Britton D, Schindler J, Graville DJ. The safety and efficacy of expiratory muscle strength training for rehabilitation after supracricoid partial laryngectomy: a pilot investigation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019;128(3):169-76. http://doi.org/10.1177/0003489418812901 PMid:30463423.
    » http://doi.org/10.1177/0003489418812901
  • 9Alexandre NMC, Gallasch CH, Lima MHM, Rodrigues RCM. A confiabilidade no desenvolvimento e avaliação de instrumentos de medida na área da saúde. Rev Eletrônica Enferm. 2013;15(3):800-7. http://doi.org/10.5216/ree.v15i3.20776
    » http://doi.org/10.5216/ree.v15i3.20776
  • 10Birring SS, Prudon B, Carr AJ, Singh SJ, Morgan MDL, Pavord ID. Development of a symptom specific health status measure for patients with chronic cough: Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Thorax. 2003;58(4):339-43. http://doi.org/10.1136/thorax.58.4.339 PMid:12668799.
    » http://doi.org/10.1136/thorax.58.4.339
  • 11Felisbino MB, Steidle LJM, Gonçalves-Tavares M, Pizzichini MMM, Pizzichini E. Leicester Cough Questionnaire: translation to Portuguese and cross-cultural adaptation for use in Brazil. J Bras Pneumol. 2014;40(3):213-21. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37132014000300003 PMid:25029643.
    » http://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37132014000300003
  • 12Morice A, Dicpinigaitis P, McGarvey L, Birring SS. Chronic cough: new insights and future prospects. Eur Respir Rev. 2021;30(162):210127. http://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0127-2021 PMid:34853095.
    » http://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0127-2021
  • 13Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, Westerman MJ, Patrick DL, Alonso J, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1159-70. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0 PMid:29550964.
    » http://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0
  • 14Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737-45. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006 PMid:20494804.
    » http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
  • 15Ribeiro VV, Lopes LW, da Silva ACF, Medeiros AH No, Vertigan A, Behlau M. Validation of Newcastle Laryngeal Hypersensitivity Questionnaire (LHQ-Br) in Brazilian Portuguese. J Voice. 2023;37(6):967.e9-13. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.06.012 PMid:34272140.
    » http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.06.012
  • 16Ribeiro VV, Vertigan A, Behlau M. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the newcastle laryngeal hypersensitivity questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese. J Voice. 2020;34(6):964.e23-34. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.06.007 PMid:31307901.
    » http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.06.007
  • 17Ribeiro VV, Lopes LW, Silva ACF, Medeiros AH No, Gartner-Schmidt J, Behlau M. Cough Severity Index: validation in Brazilian Portuguese. J Voice Off J Voice Found. 2023;37(6):967.e15-20. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.06.014 PMid:34266734.
    » http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.06.014
  • 18Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231881.001.0001
    » http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231881.001.0001
  • 19Damasio B. Uso da análise fatorial exploratória em psicologia. Aval Psicol. 2012;11:213-28.
  • 20Hair J, Black W, Sant’Ana A. Análise multivariada de dados. 6. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman; 2000.
  • 21Kazi AM, Khalid W. Questionnaire designing and validation. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012;62(5):514-6. PMid:22755326.
  • 22Ahmed I, Ishtiaq S. Reliability and validity: Importance in Medical Research. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021;71(10):2401-6. http://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.06-861 PMid:34974579.
    » http://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.06-861
  • 23Reynolds JE, Jetté ME, Wright ML, Sundar KM, Gillespie AI, Slovarp LJ. Normative Values for the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in Healthy Individuals. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023;132(6):705-8. http://doi.org/10.1177/00034894221112517 PMid:35833581.
    » http://doi.org/10.1177/00034894221112517
  • 24Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB, Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Propriedades psicométricas na avaliação de instrumentos: avaliação da confiabilidade e da validade. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017;26(3):649-59. http://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022 PMid:28977189.
    » http://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022
  • 25Nguyen AM, Schelfhout J, Muccino D, Bacci ED, La Rosa C, Vernon M, et al. Leicester Cough Questionnaire validation and clinically important thresholds for change in refractory or unexplained chronic cough. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2022;16:17534666221099737. http://doi.org/10.1177/17534666221099737 PMid:35614875.
    » http://doi.org/10.1177/17534666221099737
  • 26Smith JA. The therapeutic landscape in chronic cough. Lung. 2024;202(1):5-16. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-023-00666-y PMid:38127133.
    » http://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-023-00666-y
  • 27Lin R, Che G. Validation of the Mandarin Chinese version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in non‐small cell lung cancer patients after surgery. Thorac Cancer. 2018;9(4):486-90. http://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12602 PMid:29484851.
    » http://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12602
  • 28Gao YH, Guan WJ, Xu G, Gao Y, Lin ZY, Tang Y, et al. Validation of the Mandarin Chinese version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in bronchiectasis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18(12):1431-7. http://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.14.0195 PMid:25517807.
    » http://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.14.0195
  • 29Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017;26(3):649-59. http://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022 PMid:28977189.
    » http://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022
  • 30Turner RD, Bothamley GH, Birring SS. P240 Validation of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in pulmonary tuberculosis. Thorax. 2015;70(Suppl 3):A197-8. http://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207770.376
    » http://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207770.376

Submetido em:
23/12/2024

Aceito em:
28/03/2025

68efd699a953952ab766be13 codas Articles
Links & Downloads

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections