Efeito das férias sobre o desenvolvimento da fluência leitora
The effect of vacation on reading fluency development
Isa Mourão Carvalho; Luiza Vitória da Cunha Ferreira; Rebecca Chrispim Silva; Dayanne Gabrielle da Cruz Oliveira; Letícia Correa Celeste; Luciana Mendonça Alves
Resumo
Objetivo: avaliar o efeito das férias na fluência leitora de escolares do Ensino Fundamental I. Método: estudo observacional longitudinal analítico. 98 escolares do 2° ao 5° ano do Ensino Fundamental realizaram a leitura de textos adequados à escolaridade antes e após as férias entre 2022 e 2024. Comparou-se o desempenho dos mesmos alunos nos dois períodos e a progressão da velocidade de leitura entre as séries durante o ano. Utilizou-se o teste T pareado para a avaliação do desempenho de leitura nos diferentes momentos, o teste T para a análise da progressão, e para calcular o tamanho de efeito, o teste d de Cohen. Resultados: Os achados evidenciam uma melhora nas medidas de velocidade de leitura entre o início e o fim do ano escolar. No entanto, também apontam diferença com relevância estatística ao comparar pré e pós férias prolongadas, indicando declínio do desempenho pós-férias, exceto para os alunos na transição do 2º para o 3º ano, em que as práticas de treino de leitura se mantiveram constantes. Os achados reforçam a importância de estratégias pedagógicas que incentivem a manutenção da leitura durante as férias. Conclusão: O presente estudo evidenciou o impacto negativo do Efeito das Férias no desempenho da fluência leitora nos escolares do 3°, 4° e 5° anos Ensino Fundamental I, que apresentaram um declínio na habilidade após o período das férias escolares prolongadas.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of vacations on the reading fluency of elementary school students. Methods: This analytical, longitudinal, observational study included 98 students from 2nd to 5th grades, who read texts appropriate for their school year before and after vacations between 2022 and 2024. The performance of the same students in both periods and the progression of reading speed between grades throughout the year were compared. The paired t-test was used to assess reading performance at different time points, the t-test to analyze progression, and Cohen’s d test to calculate the effect size. Results: The findings show an improvement in reading speed measures between the beginning and end of the school year. However, they also point to a statistically significant difference between before and after extended vacations, indicating a decline in post-vacation performance – except for students going from 2nd to 3rd grade, whose reading practice remained constant. The findings reinforce the importance of pedagogical strategies to encourage continued reading during vacation. Conclusion: This study highlighted the negative impact of the vacation effect on reading fluency performance among 3rd-, 4th-, and 5th-grade students, whose reading fluency declined after the extended school vacation.
Keywords
References
1Cooper H. Summer learning loss: the problem and some solutions. Washington (DC): ERIC Digest; U.S. Department of Education; 2003 [citado em 2025 Jan 7]. Disponível em: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED475391.pdf
» https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED475391.pdf
2Hammer CS, Lawrence FR, Miccio AW. The effect of summer vacation on bilingual preschoolers’ language development. Clin Linguist Phon. 2008;22(9):686-702. http://doi.org/10.1080/02699200802028033 PMid:18608240.
» http://doi.org/10.1080/02699200802028033
3Menard J, Wilson AM. Summer learning loss among elementary school children with reading disabilities. Except Educ Int. 2014;23(1):72-85. http://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v23i1.7705
» http://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v23i1.7705
4Campbell LO, Sutter CC, Lambie GW. An investigation of the summer learning effect on fourth grade students’ reading scores. Read Psychol. 2019;40(5):465-90. http://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2019.1629516
» http://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2019.1629516
5Kuhfeld M. Surprising new evidence on summer learning loss. Phi Delta Kappan. 2019;101(1):25-9. http://doi.org/10.1177/0031721719871560
» http://doi.org/10.1177/0031721719871560
6Gierczyk M, Hornby G. Summer learning loss: review of research and implications for remediation of post-pandemic learning loss. Children. 2023;67(3):132-40. http://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2023.2204823 PMid:38275422.
» http://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2023.2204823
7Alves LM, Carvalho IM, Santos LF, Ribeiro GL, Freire LSC, Martins-Reis VO, et al. Reading fluency during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022;80(10):994-1003. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758446 PMid:36535283.
» http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758446
8Gough PB, Juel C, Griffith PL. Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In: Gough PB, Ehri LC, Treiman R, editors. Reading acquisition. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1992. p. 35-48.
9Scarborough HA. Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: evidence, theory, and practice. In: Neuman SB, Dickinson DK, editors. Handbook of research in early literacy. New York: Guilford Press; 2001.
10NRP: National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instructions. Bethesda: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. 2000.
11Alves LM, Santos LF, Miranda ICC, Carvalho IM, Ribeiro GL, Freire LSC, et al. Evolução da velocidade de leitura no Ensino Fundamental I e II. CoDAS. 2021;33(5):e20200168. http://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202020168 PMid:34259754.
» http://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202020168
12Kuhn MR, Schwanenflugel PJ, Meisinger EB. Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Read Res Q. 2010;45(2):230-51. http://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4
» http://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4
13Kim YG, Quinn JM, Petscher Y. What is text reading fluency and is it a predictor or an outcome of reading comprehension? A longitudinal investigation. Dev Psychol. 2021;57(5):718-32. http://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001167 PMid:34166017.
» http://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001167
14Pereira ES, Alves LM, Martins-Reis VO, Celeste LC. Indicador de evolução da competência leitora na educação especial: uma proposta de indicador educacional. DELTA Doc Estud Lingüíst Teór Apl. 2022;38(2):202238248237. http://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460x202238248237
» http://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460x202238248237
15Martins-Reis VO, Pedroso DAA, Almeida LM, Pereira ES, Alves LM, Celeste LC. A fluência e compreensão leitora como indicador de desempenho no 3o ano do Ensino Fundamental. CoDAS. 2023;35(6):e20210251. http://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232021251pt PMid:37672411.
» http://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232021251pt
16Kawano CE, Kida ASB, Carvalho CAF, Ávila CRB. Parâmetros de fluência e tipos de erros na leitura de escolares com indicação de dificuldades para ler e escrever. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2011;1(16):9-18. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342011000100004
» http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342011000100004
17Klauda SL, Guthrie JT. Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. J Educ Psychol. 2008;100(2):310-21. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310
» http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310
18Cooper H, Charlton K, Valentine JC, Muhlenbruck L. Making the most of summer school: a meta-analytic and narrative review. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2000;65(1):119-27. PMid:12467098.
19Bowers LM, Schwarz I. Preventing summer learning loss: results of a summer literacy program for students from low-SES homes. Read Writ Q. 2017;34(2):99-116. http://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2017.1344943
» http://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2017.1344943
20Saraiva RA, Moojen SMP, Munarski R, Gonçalves HA. *Avaliação da compreensão leitora de textos expositivos*. 1st ed. São Paulo: Pearson; 2020. 232 p.
21Alves LM, Melo FSMC, Celeste LC. LEPIC® – software de análise da leitura. In: Alves LM, Mousinho R, Capellini SA, editors. Dislexia: novos temas, novas perspectivas. Rio de Janeiro: Wak Editora; 2018. p. 183-200. (vol. IV).
22Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
23Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Lei Federal nº 10.172, de 9 de janeiro de 2001. Aprova o Plano Nacional de Educação e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União; Brasília; 9 jan. 2001.
24Cogo-Moreira H, Molinari GL, Carvalho CAF, Kida ASB, Lúcio PS, Avila CRB. Pontos de corte, sensibilidade e especificidade para rastreamento da fluência leitora em crianças. CoDAS. 2023;35(3):e20210263. http://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232021263pt PMid:37283398.
» http://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232021263pt
25von Hippel PT, Workman J, Downey DB. Inequality in reading and math skills forms mainly before kindergarten: A replication, and partial correction, of “Are schools the great equalizer?”. Sociol Educ. 2018;91(4):323-57. http://doi.org/10.1177/0038040718801760 PMid:38818352.
» http://doi.org/10.1177/0038040718801760
26Donnelly PM, Huber E, Yeatman JD. Intensive summer intervention drives linear growth of reading skill in struggling readers. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1900. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01900 PMid:31507482.
» http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01900
27Rosqvist I, Sandgren O, Andersson K, Hansson K, Lyberg-Åhlander V, Sahlén B. Children’s development of semantic verbal fluency during summer vacation versus during formal schooling. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2020;45(3):134-42. http://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2019.1637456 PMid:31272256.
Submitted date:
01/07/2025
Accepted date:
04/19/2025
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email