CoDAS
http://www.codas.periodikos.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/e20250098en
CoDAS
Artigo Original

Language attitudes of Generation Z in responding to teacher questions in learning interactions

Imam Suyitno; Ary Fawzi; Heni Dwi Arista

Downloads: 0
Views: 126

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the language attitudes of Generation Z in responding to teacher questions in the classroom interaction. The focus of the study was the problems of the diversity of language forms and strategies, the influencing factors, and their implications for learning dynamics. Methods: This study used a qualitative approach, and the data collection was conducted through observation and semi-structured interviews. Researchers observe and record students’ speech and its contexts related to their responses to teacher questions during Indonesian language, arts and culture, and mathematics lessons. After class activities, the researcher conducted semi-structured interviews with students to explore causal factors related to language habits and the use of digital social media. The researchers also interviewed teachers to explore the impact of these speeches use in learning interaction. Results: The study reveals that Generation Z students respond to teachers’ questions frequently using informal Indonesian, slang, regional languages, and mixed language styles, reflecting their preference for familiarity and self-expression over strict formality in classroom interactions. Students employ diverse language strategies to respond to teachers’ questions, such as short answers, humor, metaphoric appeals, and challenges. The study found that Generation Z’s speech in responding to teacher questions is influenced by social media exposure, informal teacher-student relationships, and socio-cultural backgrounds, leading to a preference for informal and digital-influenced language in the classroom and social interactions. Conclusion: This study concludes that Generation Z’s language attitudes in the classroom are different from previous generations in responding to teacher questions. Generation Z’s language attitudes are influenced by language in digital social media and local culture, fostering egalitarian interactions while posing challenges in maintaining academic formality.

Keywords

Language Attitude; Generation Z; Teacher Questions; Student’s Responses; Learning Interaction

Referências

  • 1Noviyenti L, Anwar K. Understanding pragmatics as a way to practice natural communication skills in various contexts of interactions. AL-ISHLAH J Pendidik. 2023;15(1):1038-52. http://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.3243
    » http://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.3243
  • 2Kholisotin L, Lastaria L. Function of language politeness in interaction between teachers and students at MIS Al Jihad Palangka Raya. Anterior J. 2017;17(1):52-9. http://doi.org/10.33084/anterior.v17i1.27
    » http://doi.org/10.33084/anterior.v17i1.27
  • 3Nasution MB, Rasyid A. The impact of differences between millennial generation and generation z on communication patterns at Madrasa Ali Imron. JHSS J Humanit Soc Stud. 2023;7(2):571-5.
  • 4Rahima AR, Kadariyah N, Hasanah NI. The use of questioning strategy in promoting students critical thinking. J Engl Lang Teach Engl Linguist. 2023;8(2):69-79. http://doi.org/10.31316/eltics.v8i2.5212
    » http://doi.org/10.31316/eltics.v8i2.5212
  • 5Sultan A, Ali R, Zahid N, Akbar R, Rajab Ali MN, Fatima SS, et al. Engaging millennial students through flipped classroom: perspectives from faculty, undergraduate medical and nursing students [Internet]. Research Square; 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 18]. Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1023200/v1
    » https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1023200/v1
  • 6Sudirman S, Atmowardoyo H, Salija K. Communication styles used by effective EFL teachers in classroom interaction. ELT Worldw J Engl Lang Teach. 2018;5(2):97-113. http://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v5i2.7332
    » http://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v5i2.7332
  • 7Loor-Saltos K, Bravo-Barrezueta S. Influence of digital media on student practice of the faculty of philosophy, letters and educational sciences. Int Res J Manag IT Soc Sci. 2022;9(6):841-53. http://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v9n6.2238
    » http://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v9n6.2238
  • 8Aljović A. Digital natives in E-learning: interaction and engagement. In: Language, Literature and Education - Joining Forces to Build a Better World; 2024; Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Proceedings. Sarajevo: International University of Sarajevo; 2024.
  • 9Telaumbanua YA, Telaumbanua NTN, Halawa MD, Gulo B, Halawa DME, Waruwu EK. The use of emojis in language communication on social media platforms. J Engl Lang Educ. 2024;9(4):118-30. http://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v9i4.524
    » http://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v9i4.524
  • 10Pasquier D. Youth cultures in the digital age. Reseaux. 2020;222(4):9-20.
  • 11Lin CH, Zheng B, Zhang Y. Interactions and learning outcomes in online language courses: online interactions and learning outcomes. Br J Educ Technol. 2016;48(3):730-48. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12457.
  • 12Rahman H, Rahman A, Irawan LA. Questioning strategies in the English classroom interaction: an effort in improving EFL learners’ language skills. J Lang Lit Stud. 2024;4(1):195-207.
  • 13Naz A, Khan W, Khan Q, Daraz U, Mujtaba B. Teacher’s questioning effects on students communication in classroom performance. J Educ Pract [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2024 Nov 18];4(7):148-58. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Teacher%E2%80%99s-Questioning-Effects-on-Students-in-Naz-Khan/b4a8e5770bb9d3172a6fb43011d245c3cdd0a153
    » https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Teacher%E2%80%99s-Questioning-Effects-on-Students-in-Naz-Khan/b4a8e5770bb9d3172a6fb43011d245c3cdd0a153
  • 14Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication; 2014. 305 p.
  • 15Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication; 2011. 785 p.
  • 16Merriam SB, Tisdell EJ. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2015.
  • 17Spradley JP. The ethnographic interview. Long Grove: Waveland Press; 2016. 247 p.
  • 18Kvale S. Doing interviews [Internet]. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication; 2017 [cited 2024 Nov 18]. Available from: https://methods.sagepub.com/book/doing-interviews
    » https://methods.sagepub.com/book/doing-interviews
  • 19Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication; 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 18]. Available from: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book232962
    » https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book232962
  • 20Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Los Angeles.: SAGE Publications; 2014. 416 p.
  • 21Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. http://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    » http://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • 22Gee JP. An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method [Internet]. London: Routledge & CRC Press; 2014 [cited 2024 Nov 18]. Available from: https://www.routledge.com/An-Introduction-to-Discourse-Analysis-Theory-and-Method/Gee/p/book/9780415725569
    » https://www.routledge.com/An-Introduction-to-Discourse-Analysis-Theory-and-Method/Gee/p/book/9780415725569
  • 23Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication; 1985. 422 p. http://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
    » http://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
  • 24Giles H, Coupland N. Language: contexts and consequences. 1st ed. Boston: Cengage Learning; 1991. 264 p.
  • 25Chandra RM, Sudjianto MK, Adriana E. Faktor-faktor komunikasi (yang perlu dimiliki) Generasi Z dalam mempersiapkan karir. Stud Res J. 2023;1(3):372-84. http://doi.org/10.55606/srjyappi.v1i3.345
    » http://doi.org/10.55606/srjyappi.v1i3.345
  • 26Lopez EN, Lopez B, Abadiano M. Understanding Generation Z, the new generation of learners: a technological-motivational-learning theory. J Harbin Eng Univ. 2023;44:770-84.
  • 27Chen M, Xiao X. The effect of social media on the development of students’ affective variables. Front Psychol. 2022;13:1010766. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010766 PMid:36186337.
    » http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010766
  • 28Tormey R. Rethinking student-teacher relationships in higher education: a multidimensional approach. High Educ. 2021;82(5):993. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00711-w
    » http://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00711-w
  • 29Ghafar Z. Social media in language learning: implications for second language motivation and linguistic acquisition: a comprehensive review. Int J Appl Sci Res. 2023;1(2):105-18.
  • 30Spier TE. Review of The Oxford Handbook of Language and Society by Garcia, Flores, and Spotti (2020). Quito: Universidad San Francisco de Quito; 2021.
  • 31Kohnová L, Papula J, Salajová N. Generation Z: education in the world of digitization for the future of organizations. In: INTED2021; 2021; Valencia, España. Proceedings. Valencia: International Academy of Technology, Education and Development; 2021. p. 10199-208.
  • 32Cilliers E. The challenge of teaching generation Z. People Int J Soc Sci. 2017;3:188-98.
  • 33Amin A, Adiansyah R, Hujjatusnaini N. The contribution of communication and digital literacy skills to critical thinking. J Pendidik Sains Indones. 2023;11(3):697-712. http://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v11i3.30838
    » http://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v11i3.30838
  • 34Adiyono A, Hayat EW, Oktavia ED, Prasetiyo NT. Learning interaction in the digital era: technological innovations and education management strategies to enhance student engagement. J Res Instr. 2024;4(1):205-21. http://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v4i1.333
    » http://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v4i1.333
  • 35Anyichie A, Butler D, Perry N, Nashon S. Examining classroom contexts in support of culturally diverse learners’ engagement: an integration of self-regulated learning and culturally responsive pedagogical practices. Frontline Learn Res. 2023;11(1):1-39. http://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v11i1.1115
    » http://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v11i1.1115
  • 36Pongen L. Exploring the integration of digital communication tools in language education:a: a comprehensive review. ShodhGyan-NU J Lit Cult Stud. 2024;2(2):9-17.
  • 37Gibson D. Bridging informal and formal learning experiences with participatory media. In Baek YK, editor. Gaming for classroom-based learning: digital role playing as a motivator of study. Hershey, PA: IGI Global Scientific Publishing; 2010. p. 84-100.
  • 38Gumperz JJ. Discourse strategies [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics) [cited 2024 Nov 20]. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/discourse-strategies/46D4D801BCC1FF7E6E31B2A19E45E92B
    » https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/discourse-strategies/46D4D801BCC1FF7E6E31B2A19E45E92B
  • 39Nunan D. Teaching English to speakers of other languages: an introduction [Internet]. London: Routledge & CRC Press; 2015 [cited 2024 Nov 20]. Available from: https://www.routledge.com/Teaching-English-to-Speakers-of-Other-Languages-An-Introduction/Nunan/p/book/9781138824676
    » https://www.routledge.com/Teaching-English-to-Speakers-of-Other-Languages-An-Introduction/Nunan/p/book/9781138824676
  • 40Prensky M. Teaching digital natives: partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press; 2010. 225 p.
  • 41Brown HD. Principles of language learning and teaching. 5th ed. White Plains, NY: Pearson Longman; 2008. 410 p.
  • 42Andrade M, Westover J. Engaging Millennial Students through Community-Engaged Experiential Learning. Exp Learn Teach High Educ. 2020;2(2):21-44.
  • 43Ogunyemi K. Language and communication in the classroom. J Educ. 2022;8(3-4):1-14.
  • 44Vygotsky LS, Cole M. Mind in society: development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1978. 180 p.
  • 45Vrabie C. Grown up digital: how the net generation is changing your world. Holistica J Bus Public Adm. 2015;6:127-9.
  • 46Diard A. How to understand and manage Generation Z [Internet]. PeopleSpheres; 2018 [cited 2024 Nov 20]. Available from: https://peoplespheres.com/how-to-understand-and-manage-generation-z/
    » https://peoplespheres.com/how-to-understand-and-manage-generation-z/
  • 47Boyd D. It’s complicated: the social lives of networked teens [Internet]. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2014 [cited 2024 Nov 20]. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5vm5gk
    » https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5vm5gk
  • 48Fernandez-Rojas R, Perry A, Singh H, Campbell B, Elsayed S, Hunjet R, et al. Contextual awareness in human-advanced-vehicle systems: a survey. IEEE Access. 2019;7:33304-28. http://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902812
    » http://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902812

Submetido em:
24/03/2025

Aceito em:
19/05/2025

68efd935a953952bf47e33b3 codas Articles
Links & Downloads

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections