CoDAS
http://www.codas.periodikos.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/e20250194pt
CoDAS
Original Article

Aplicação de instrumento de baixo custo na identificação de risco para alterações auditivas em uma rede municipal de saúde

Application of a low-cost instrument to identify risk for hearing disorders in a municipal health network

Monize Menon; Seisse Gabriela Gandolfi Sanches; Alessandra Giannella Samelli

Downloads: 0
Views: 16

Resumo

Objetivo: Avaliar o desempenho do aplicativo PETIT (triagem automatizada em tablet), em comparação com a varredura audiométrica, na identificação de risco para alterações auditivas em escolares, utilizando fones de ouvido com cancelamento de ruído passivo. Método: Estudo observacional transversal com 122 crianças (05 a 08 anos) da rede pública municipal de Santana de Parnaíba. Foram realizados meatoscopia; triagem automatizada via tablet (com fones Sennheiser HD-280); triagem por varredura audiométrica. Parte da amostra realizou também audiometria convencional (padrão-ouro). Para análise, foram utilizados: testes binomial e de regressão logística binária, assim como cálculo de sensibilidade, especificidade e acurácia. Resultados: Houve associação significativa entre os resultados da triagem por varredura e do PETIT, assim como o coeficiente da variável preditora (audiometria convencional) foi estatisticamente significativo ao desempenho na triagem por varredura. Para o PETIT, verificou-se sensibilidade de 85,7%, especificidade de 100% e 99,18% de acurácia. Conclusão: Os resultados sugerem que esta ferramenta tem aplicabilidade promissora em ambiente escolar, podendo facilitar a identificação de crianças de risco para alterações auditivas.

Palavras-chave

Audição; Triagem; Estudantes; Diagnóstico; Tecnologia de Baixo Custo

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of the PETIT application (automated tablet-based screening) compared with conventional sweep screening in identifying the risk of hearing impairment in school-aged children, using headphones with passive noise cancellation. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study including 122 children (aged 5 to 8 years) from the public school of Santana de Parnaíba. The following procedures were performed: otoscopy; automated hearing screening via tablet (with Sennheiser HD-280 headphones); and conventional sweep screening. Part of the sample also underwent pure-tone audiometry. Statistical analysis used binomial and binary logistic regression tests, along with the calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Results: There was significant association between the results of the sweep screening and PETIT, as well as the coefficient of the predictor variable (conventional audiometry) was significant to the performance in the sweep screening. For PETIT, a sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 99.18% were observed. Conclusion: The results suggest that this tool has promising applicability in schools for identifying children at risk of hearing impairments.

Keywords

Hearing; Mass Screening; Student; Diagnosis; Low-Cost Technology

References

  • 1Samelli AG, Rondon-Melo S, Rabelo CM, Molini-Avejonas DR. Association between language and hearing disorders: risk identification. Clinics. 2017;72(4):213-7. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(04)04 PMid:28492720.
    » https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(04)04
  • 2ASHA: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Effects of hearing loss on development [Internet]. Rockville: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2020 [citado em 2024 Jun 24]. Disponível em: https://www.asha.org/public/hearing/effects-of-hearing-loss-ondevelopment/
    » https://www.asha.org/public/hearing/effects-of-hearing-loss-ondevelopment/
  • 3van der Straaten TFK, Rieffe C, Soede W, Netten AP, Dirks E, Oudesluys-Murphy AM, et al. Quality of life of children with hearing loss in special and mainstream education: a longitudinal study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;128:109701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109701 PMid:31606686.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109701
  • 4WHO: World Health Organization. World report on hearing. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
  • 5Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2019 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Rockville: Joint Committee on Infant Hearing; 2019.
  • 6Su JY, Guthridge S, He VY, Howard D, Leach AJ. The impact of hearing impairment on early academic achievement in Aboriginal children living in remote Australia: a data linkage study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1521. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09620-6 PMid:33028291.
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09620-6
  • 7IBGE: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa nacional de saúde 2019: ciclos de vida. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2021.
  • 8Nunes-Araújo ADS, Balen SA, Pereira A Jr, Barbosa IR. Hearing screening in schoolchildren: accuracy of different criteria used to analyze transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. CoDAS. 2022;34(2):e20210067.
  • 9Lopes AA, Friche AAL, Lemos SMA, Bicalho L, Silva AMM, Santos TS, et al. Prevalence of hearing loss and health vulnerability in children aged 25 to 36 months: an analysis of spatial distribution. CoDAS. 2022;34(3):e20210079. PMid:38055408.
  • 10Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria nº 2.073, de 28 de setembro de 2004. Institui a Política Nacional de Atenção à Saúde Auditiva. Diário Oficial da União; Brasília; 28 set. 2004.
  • 11Brasil. Presidência da República. Decreto nº 6.286, de 5 de dezembro de 2007. Institui o Programa Saúde na Escola. Diário Oficial da União; Brasília; 6 dec. 2007.
  • 12Duarte JL, Silva K, Carlino FC, Souza MVA, Vieira GSP, Carregosa AM, et al. Panorama da saúde auditiva infantil no Sistema Único de Saúde no estado de Sergipe. CoDAS. 2024;36(1):e20210197. PMid:38126548.
  • 13Vernier LS, Cazella SC, Levandowski DC. Neonatal hearing screening: protocols, obstacles and perspectives of speech therapists in Brazil — 10 years of Brazilian Federal Law 12.303/2010. CoDAS. 2022;34(2):e20200331. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212020331 PMid:35043864.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212020331
  • 14Fitzpatrick EM, McCurdy L, Whittingham J, Rourke R, Nassrallah R, Grandpierre V, et al. Hearing loss prevalence and hearing health among school-aged children in the Canadian Arctic. Int J Audiol. 2020 PMid:32180475.
  • 15Jensen JS, Schnohr C, Skovsen CF, Homøe P, Jensen RG. Examination of hearing loss among school-aged children in Greenland. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;149:110865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110865 PMid:34385040.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110865
  • 16WHO: World Health Organization. Deafness and hearing loss: key facts [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023 [citado em 2024 Jun 24]. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss
    » https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss
  • 17Yong M, Liang J, Ballreich J, Lea J, Westerberg BD, Emmett SD. Cost-effectiveness of school hearing screening programs: a scoping review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;162(6):826-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820913507 PMid:32228135.
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820913507
  • 18Samelli AG, Rabelo CM, Sanches SGG, Martinho AC, Matas CG. Tablet-based tele-audiometry: automated hearing screening for schoolchildren. J Telemed Telecare. 2020;26(3):140-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X18800856 PMid:30269641.
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X18800856
  • 19Samelli AG. Desenvolvimento e validação de um método de teleaudiometria para tablet: triagem auditiva automática em escolares [tese]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 2017.
  • 20Lo AH, McPherson B. Hearing screening for school children: utility of noise-cancelling headphones. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2013;13(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-13-6 PMid:23705872.
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-13-6
  • 21ASHA: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Guidelines for audiological screening [Internet]. Rockville: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 1997 [citado em 2024 Jun 24]. Disponível em: www.asha.org/policy
    » www.asha.org/policy
  • 22American Academy of Audiology. Childhood hearing screening guidelines. Reston: American Academy of Audiology; 2011.
  • 23Silman S, Silverman CA. Basic audiologic testing. In: Silman S, Silverman CA, editors. Auditory diagnosis: principles and applications. 2nd ed. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 1997.
  • 24Mahomed-Asmail F, Swanepoel DW, Eikelboom RH, Myburgh HC, Hall JW 3rd. Clinical validity of hearScreen smartphone hearing screening for school children. Ear Hear. 2016;37(1):e11-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000223 PMid:26372265.
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000223
  • 25Ganek HV, Madubueze A, Merritt CE, Bhutta ZA. Prevalence of hearing loss in children living in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2023;65(5):600-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15460 PMid:36397253.
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15460
  • 26Moepeng M, Singh S, Ramma L. Contextually appropriate school entry hearing screening protocol for low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;147:110788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110788 PMid:34120029.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110788
  • 27Cadena AC, Lindholm N, Stenfeldt K. School-based hearing screening in Sweden: evaluation of current practices. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;150:110938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110938 PMid:34634590.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110938
  • 28Skarżyński H, Gos E, Świerniak W, Skarżyński PH. Prevalence of hearing loss among Polish school-age children from rural areas. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;128:109676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109676 PMid:31563753.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109676
  • 29Tuohimaa K, Loukusa S, Löppönen H, Välimaa T, Kunnari S. Communication abilities in children with hearing loss. J Commun Disord. 2022;99:106256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106256 PMid:36029613.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106256
  • 30Melo IM, Silva ARX, Camargo R, Cavalcanti HG, Ferrari DV, Taveira KV, et al. Accuracy of smartphone-based hearing screening tests: a systematic review. CoDAS. 2022;34(3):e20200380. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212020380 PMid:35239828.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212020380
  • 31Alothman NI, Alanazi AA. School-based hearing screening of first-grade students in Saudi Arabia: a pilot study. S Afr J Commun Disord. 2024;71(1):e1-7. https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJCD.v71i1.1063 PMid:39625087.
    » https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJCD.v71i1.1063
  • 32Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Diretrizes de atenção da triagem auditiva neonatal. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012.
  • 33Botasso M, Sanches SG, Bento RF, Samelli AG. Teleaudiometry as a screening method in school children. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015;70(4):283-8. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2015(04)11 PMid:26017796.
    » https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2015(04)11
  • 34Balen SA. Triagem auditiva em escolares. In: Marchesan IQ, Silva HJ, Tomé MC, editors. Tratado de especialidades em fonoaudiologia. São Paulo: Guanabara Koogan; 2014. p. 981-6.
  • 35Bussé AML, Mackey AR, Carr G, Hoeve HLJ, Uhlén IM, Goedegebure A, et al. Assessment of hearing screening programmes across 47 countries. Int J Audiol. 2021;60(11):841-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2021.1897170 PMid:33835906.
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2021.1897170
  • 36Vernier LS, Cazella SC, Levandowski DC. Neonatal hearing screening: protocols, obstacles and perspectives of speech therapists in Brazil. CoDAS. 2022;34(2):e20200331. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212020331 PMid:35043864.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212020331
  • 37WHO: World Health Organization. Hearing screening: considerations for implementation. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
  • 38Aquino CP. Avaliação de dois diferentes tipos de fones durante o uso de um método de teleaudiometria para tablet [dissertação]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 2020. https://doi.org/10.11606/D.5.2020.tde-16062021-125346
    » https://doi.org/10.11606/D.5.2020.tde-16062021-125346
  • 39Klarna. Sennheiser HD 280 PRO headphones — price tracker [Internet]. Stockholm: Klarna; 2025 [citado em 2024 Jun 24]. Disponível em: https://www.klarna.com
    » https://www.klarna.com
  • 40Evident Scientific. Telephonics TDH-39 audiometer headphones [Internet]. Hamburg: Evident Scientific; 2025 [citado em 2024 Jun 24]. Disponível em: https://www.evident-shop.de
    » https://www.evident-shop.de

Submitted date:
06/02/2025

Accepted date:
02/26/2026

6aa9767aa9539552012bb8e9 codas Articles

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections